Manchester City’s 115 Charges Reported Mostly Proven, Guardiola’s Trophies at Risk

• An independent tribunal has reportedly ruled that most of Manchester City’s 115 Premier League charges are proven, sending the case into an appeal stage that neither side can escape to Europe’s highest sports court.
• The charges cover alleged financial rule breaches from 2009 to 2018, including inaccurate financial disclosures and a failure to cooperate with investigators between 2019 and 2023.
• Chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak says City’s confidence in its own innocence has not moved, but the sanctions on the table run from a fine to a points deduction to expulsion from the league.

Eight Years After the First Leaked Emails, City’s Fight Moves to a Court With No Way Out to Europe

Manchester City have spent eight years telling anyone who would listen that the Premier League’s financial rules case against them would end in vindication. On Friday, that story got harder to tell. Sky Sports reported that an independent tribunal, after a hearing that ran twelve weeks, found that most of the 115 charges against the club are proven. The Premier League will not confirm or deny it. Confidentiality rules bind everyone in the process, so the news reached the public through reports rather than an official verdict.

City have not accepted that outcome. Chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak used a statement on Saturday to say the club’s confidence in its own innocence “is just as strong as when this began.” But the tribunal’s reported finding opens a new stage of the case, one that could end in a fine, a points deduction, or a sanction severe enough to threaten City’s place in the Premier League altogether.

What the 115 Charges Actually Cover

The charges split into five groups. Fifty four accuse City of giving inaccurate financial information to the Premier League. Thirty five allege a failure to cooperate with the investigation itself, covering 2019 to 2023. Fourteen concern inaccurate details of payments made to players and a manager. Seven allege breaches of profitability and sustainability rules, and five relate to violations of UEFA’s own Financial Fair Play rules. Taken together, City are alleged to have misrepresented their finances across nine seasons, and the true number of individual breaches is believed to run closer to 130 once every charge is counted separately.

The case traces back to 2018, when the German magazine Der Spiegel published a series of articles built on emails obtained by the hacker Rui Pinto. UEFA investigated first. In 2020, European football’s governing body found City guilty and handed down a two year ban from its own competitions along with a 30 million euro fine. City took that case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, which lifted the ban entirely and cut the fine to 10 million euros, ruling that most of the allegations were either unproven or had passed the point where UEFA could still act on them.

The Premier League faced no such time limit. It charged City in February 2023, and the case has run for two and a half years, ending in a hearing that lasted twelve weeks before concluding earlier this year. That gap between the two processes is itself part of the story: UEFA’s rules gave City a route out on a technicality, while the Premier League’s did not.

A Chairman’s Defiance

City’s public position has held from the moment the charges were filed. In a Friday statement, the club said the Premier League process “remains ongoing, with significant elements to be completed, and subject to strict confidentiality.” A day later, Al Mubarak went further, addressing the reports directly rather than staying quiet.

“The Premier League process still has a long way to run, and our confidence and intent in proving the club’s innocence is just as strong as when this began,” he said.

He also pushed back on how fast people had reacted to Friday’s reports. “While some people have been quick to reach their own conclusions, and there is so much noise swirling around us, nothing has changed,” Al Mubarak said.

That last line points to the real problem City now face. For two and a half years, the club could treat the case as unresolved, a matter for lawyers and a private tribunal. That changed the moment reports of a mostly proven case reached the public. City’s title wins and Champions League run under Pep Guardiola were built in exactly the years the charges cover, from 2009 to 2018. A tribunal finding that the club misrepresented its finances in that period does not erase the trophies, but it reopens the question of how they were funded.

What Happens Next

City and the Premier League each have fourteen days from the tribunal’s judgment to appeal. A new three person commission will hear it, appointed by Sir Gary Hickinbottom, the chair of the Premier League’s independent judicial panel. At least one member must have held judicial office, and that person will chair the appeal board. The grounds for a successful appeal are narrow: fraud, misconduct, or a decision so unfair it cannot stand. City cannot take the case beyond that board. Unlike the UEFA case, there is no route to the Court of Arbitration for Sport this time.

The Premier League has no fixed scale of punishments for financial rule breaches, a gap it examined closing last year before leaving the rules as they stood. The sanctions still on the table stretch from a fine at one end to points deductions, restrictions on registering new players, suspension from matches, compensation orders, ordered replays of matches, and expulsion from the league at the other. English football already has recent points deductions to measure against. Everton were docked ten points in the 2023/24 season for breaching spending rules, reduced to six points on appeal, then hit with a separate two point deduction for a second breach. Nottingham Forest lost four points that same season for a similar breach. Derby County were deducted 21 points in the 2021/22 season alone, 12 points for entering administration and nine for breaching accounting rules, earlier in the decade. In each of those cases, the points were taken off a club fighting relegation, not a club that had spent most of the period in question winning the league.

None of those clubs had won six Premier League titles and a Champions League in the years under scrutiny. If the tribunal’s findings survive an appeal, City would represent something the Premier League has never had to sanction: a champion club found to have broken the rules that were meant to keep the competition fair while it was winning.

A Fight Beyond the Tribunal

Even a settled appeal would not close the book on City’s exposure. Other clubs that missed out on titles, European qualification, or prize money over City’s run of dominance could pursue separate legal claims against them for those lost chances, once football’s own process ends. Rival boardrooms have watched this case for years for exactly that reason. A tribunal finding that City gained an edge through rule breaking gives those clubs something they have not had before: an official basis for arguing they were denied revenue and trophies they would otherwise have earned. That turns what has been an internal football dispute into something with financial consequences that could run well past any fine the Premier League itself imposes.

The case also lands at a moment when financial rules are already a live issue across the league. City and the Premier League only settled a separate legal dispute over Associated Party Transaction rules last year, and Everton, Forest and other clubs have all faced their own points deductions for breaching profitability and sustainability rules in recent seasons. Those cases involved clubs spending beyond their means to try to stay competitive. City’s case, if the reports hold up, would be different in scale and in stakes: a finding that the league’s most successful club broke the same kind of rules, over a far longer period, while winning almost everything there was to win. How the Premier League handles that outcome will shape how far it is willing to go in enforcing its own regulations against the clubs at the very top of the table, not just the ones fighting to stay in it.

Al Mubarak’s Saturday statement gave no sign that City plan to change course. The club has treated this as a fight it will win from the day it was charged, and nothing in his words suggested that has shifted. But the eight years after the first leaked emails surfaced have narrowed the routes left for City to prove it. An appeal board with no path to Europe’s highest sports court is the last stop on this road. Whatever it decides will shape not just City’s punishment, but how the most successful era in the club’s history is remembered.

WRITTEN BY

Jarrod

Jarrod Partridge is the Founder of Futbol Chronicle and an accredited journalist with over 30 years of experience following international football. A member of the AIPS International Sports Press Association, Jarrod has covered matches at stadiums around the world, bringing first-hand insight to every match report, player profile, and tactical analysis he writes.

More articles by Jarrod →